X12 835 SVC segment:
SVC01 = composite procedure
SVC02 = charge
SVC03 = payment
SVC04 = Unit or Basis for Measurement Code (UN, MJ, DA, ...)
SVC05 = Service Unit Count
The parser previously read SVC04 as the units count and SVC05 as the
unit type — backwards. On real 835s (and the canonical minimal
fixture), SVC04 carries the code 'UN' which fails Decimal parsing, so
the units always came out as None and the code string was assigned to
unit_type. SP7's line-level matcher couldn't compare units on the SVC
side against the claim side because of this.
- _consume_service_payment: SVC04 → unit_type, SVC05 → units count
- Default unit_type to 'UN' when only the count is present
- minimal_835.txt + unbalanced_835.txt: swap positions to match spec
- Add 2 regression tests (units-and-unit-type, default-unit-type-to-UN)
Nora
Tyler