Two related fixes land together because the UI was reporting
"1 accepted 1 rejected" for every 999 even though every inbound file
Gainwell ships has IK5=A.
1. Gainwell's MFT uses IK5 where the X12 005010X231A1 spec calls
for AK5 (the per-set accept/reject segment). The parser only
recognized AK5, so set_responses[0].set_accept_reject.code
defaulted to 'R' and the count summary showed all rejections.
_consume_ak2 now accepts either AK5 or IK5; the orchestrator's
segment-skip set picks up IK5 too. A new fixture
(minimal_999_ik5_gainwell.txt) is a verbatim copy of one of the
files in the FromHPE inbound staging dir.
2. _ack_count_summary (api + scheduler) now trusts the per-set
IK5 codes over the functional-group AK9. Gainwell's AK9 is
internally inconsistent — the per-claim IK5=A but the AK9
reports accepted=1, rejected=1, received=1 (sum exceeds
received). Trusting the per-set codes restores the right
answer: accepted=1, rejected=0, code='A'.
3. The Acks page now has a TA1 envelope register alongside the
999 register. TA1s are the lower-level sibling of the 999
(one row per inbound ISA/IEA). The backend surface (parser,
store, API at /api/ta1-acks) was already in place; this
adds the UI: Ta1Ack type, listTa1Acks API method, useTa1Acks
hook, and a Ta1AcksSection card with KPIs + table.
After reprocessing 1056 cached 999s through the new code: every row
shows code='A' with accepted=1, rejected=0 — matches the Gainwell
portal's per-claim accepted state. The user's earlier observation
("the claims look to be accepted in the portal") was correct: the
underlying claim state was always fine, only the displayed count was
wrong.
- backend/src/cyclone/parsers/parse_999.py | 21 ++-
- backend/src/cyclone/api.py | 11 +-
- backend/src/cyclone/scheduler.py | 13 +-
- backend/tests/test_parse_999.py | 32 ++++
- backend/tests/fixtures/minimal_999_ik5_gainwell.txt
- src/types/index.ts | 32 ++++
- src/lib/api.ts | 62 +++++-
- src/hooks/useTa1Acks.ts | 26 +++ (new)
- src/pages/Acks.tsx | 209 +++++++++++++++++++-
Nora
Tyler