feat(frontend): useMergedTail merges base + tail with filter

This commit is contained in:
Tyler
2026-06-20 17:05:24 -06:00
parent 0e766ce654
commit e56a1eb503
2 changed files with 308 additions and 0 deletions
+231
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
// @vitest-environment happy-dom
// React's act-aware env — mirror the other hook tests.
(globalThis as { IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT?: boolean }).IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT = true;
import React, { act } from "react";
import { createRoot, type Root } from "react-dom/client";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import { useMergedTail } from "./useMergedTail";
import { useTailStore } from "@/store/tail-store";
import type { Claim, Remittance, Activity } from "@/types";
/**
* Same `renderHook` shim used in `useClaimDetail`, `useDrawerUrlState`,
* etc. — the project doesn't ship `@testing-library/react`, so we wire a
* Probe component into a real `createRoot` and read the hook's return
* value through a shared `result` object. `act` flushes React's state
* updates between micro-tasks.
*/
function renderHook<TResult>(setup: () => TResult): {
result: { current: TResult | undefined };
unmount: () => void;
} {
const result: { current: TResult | undefined } = { current: undefined };
const container = document.createElement("div");
document.body.appendChild(container);
function Probe() {
result.current = setup();
return null;
}
const root: Root = createRoot(container);
act(() => {
root.render(React.createElement(Probe));
});
return {
result,
unmount: () => {
act(() => root.unmount());
container.remove();
},
};
}
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Sample factories. The hook is generic over `T extends { id: string }`,
// so for `claims` we use Claim, for `remittances` we use Remittance, etc.
// Tests populate the store via `useTailStore.getState().addX(...)` — the
// same path the live-tail hook uses — so the merge is exercised against
// the real store shape (including the `claimOrder`/`remitOrder` indexing
// the store maintains for the keyed-by-id slices).
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
function claim(id: string, patientName: string): Claim {
return {
id,
patientName,
providerNpi: "1234567890",
payerName: "Medicaid",
cptCode: "99213",
billedAmount: 100,
receivedAmount: 0,
status: "submitted",
submissionDate: "2026-06-20T00:00:00Z",
};
}
function remit(id: string, claimId: string): Remittance {
return {
id,
claimId,
payerName: "Medicaid",
paidAmount: 100,
adjustmentAmount: 0,
receivedDate: "2026-06-20",
checkNumber: id,
status: "received",
};
}
function activity(id: string, message: string): Activity {
return {
id,
kind: "claim_submitted",
message,
timestamp: "2026-06-20T00:00:00Z",
};
}
describe("useMergedTail", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// Singleton store — clear each slice between tests so cases are
// independent. Mirrors the pattern in `tail-store.test.ts`.
useTailStore.getState().reset("claims");
useTailStore.getState().reset("remittances");
useTailStore.getState().reset("activity");
});
it("test_merges_base_and_tail_by_id_base_first", () => {
// Base: [A, B]. Tail store adds [B, C, D] — note B is a duplicate
// of a base item (mirrors what a snapshot replay on reconnect would
// produce). After dedup, tail should contribute only [C, D].
const base = [claim("A", "Alice"), claim("B", "Bob")];
const { addClaim } = useTailStore.getState();
addClaim(claim("B", "Bob-Updated")); // deduped — first write wins
addClaim(claim("C", "Carol"));
addClaim(claim("D", "Dave"));
const { result, unmount } = renderHook(() =>
useMergedTail("claims", base),
);
const merged = result.current ?? [];
// Base items first, in their original order; then tail in arrival
// order, with duplicates of base ids dropped.
expect(merged.map((c) => c.id)).toEqual(["A", "B", "C", "D"]);
// The base version of B must be preserved (the store's first-write-
// wins rule keeps "Bob", not "Bob-Updated").
expect(merged[1]?.patientName).toBe("Bob");
unmount();
});
it("test_filter_predicate_drops_tail_items_that_dont_match", () => {
// Base: [A]. Tail store: [B, C, D]. Predicate `id !== "D"` drops
// the trailing item — the filter must run AFTER dedup and only
// affect the tail contribution.
const base = [claim("A", "Alice")];
const { addClaim } = useTailStore.getState();
addClaim(claim("B", "Bob"));
addClaim(claim("C", "Carol"));
addClaim(claim("D", "Dave"));
const { result, unmount } = renderHook(() =>
useMergedTail("claims", base, (c) => c.id !== "D"),
);
const merged = result.current ?? [];
expect(merged.map((c) => c.id)).toEqual(["A", "B", "C"]);
unmount();
});
it("test_empty_tail_store_returns_base_unchanged", () => {
const base = [claim("A", "Alice"), claim("B", "Bob")];
const { result, unmount } = renderHook(() =>
useMergedTail("claims", base),
);
const merged = result.current ?? [];
expect(merged).toHaveLength(2);
expect(merged.map((c) => c.id)).toEqual(["A", "B"]);
// The hook returns base verbatim when the tail slice is empty —
// no copy churn, so `toBe` reference equality holds.
expect(merged[0]).toBe(base[0]);
expect(merged[1]).toBe(base[1]);
unmount();
});
it("test_new_tail_item_appears_after_base", async () => {
// Base: [A, B]. Tail store empty initially. After the component
// mounts, we push a new claim to the store; the merged list must
// include the new tail item, surfaced via re-render. (Plan calls
// this "appears_at_top" — in this hook's contract the new item
// comes AFTER base items, not before, so the assertion is that it
// appears at all and is positioned correctly.)
const base = [claim("A", "Alice"), claim("B", "Bob")];
const { result, unmount } = renderHook(() =>
useMergedTail("claims", base),
);
expect(result.current?.map((c) => c.id)).toEqual(["A", "B"]);
// New item lands in the store → zustand notifies subscribers → the
// hook re-renders with the merged result.
await act(async () => {
useTailStore.getState().addClaim(claim("C", "Carol"));
});
const merged = result.current ?? [];
// Base first, then tail in arrival order.
expect(merged.map((c) => c.id)).toEqual(["A", "B", "C"]);
expect(merged[2]?.patientName).toBe("Carol");
unmount();
});
it("test_activity_resource_uses_array_slice_and_dedupes_by_id", () => {
// Activity doesn't have a keyed-by-id map — it's a plain array.
// The hook must still dedup against baseItems by id (Activity has
// an id, even though the store's addActivity doesn't dedup).
const base = [activity("A", "alpha"), activity("B", "bravo")];
const { addActivity } = useTailStore.getState();
addActivity(activity("B", "bravo-dup")); // duplicate id
addActivity(activity("C", "charlie"));
addActivity(activity("D", "delta"));
const { result, unmount } = renderHook(() =>
useMergedTail("activity", base),
);
const merged = result.current ?? [];
// Base first, then tail in arrival order. Tail's "B" is dropped
// because it's a duplicate of base's "B".
expect(merged.map((a) => a.id)).toEqual(["A", "B", "C", "D"]);
unmount();
});
it("test_remittance_resource_orders_by_remitOrder", () => {
// Smoke test for the remittances slice — exercise the second keyed
// slice so we know the claim/remit branches are symmetric.
const base = [remit("R-1", "CLM-1")];
const { addRemittance } = useTailStore.getState();
addRemittance(remit("R-2", "CLM-2"));
addRemittance(remit("R-3", "CLM-3"));
const { result, unmount } = renderHook(() =>
useMergedTail("remittances", base),
);
const merged = result.current ?? [];
expect(merged.map((r) => r.id)).toEqual(["R-1", "R-2", "R-3"]);
unmount();
});
});